Oxygen levels depleted https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn_DeBjZTNI
“ The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) “considers any atmosphere with an oxygen level below 19.5 percent to be oxygen-deficient and immediately dangerous to life or health.”
“We’re gonna bring in our first student because, of course, the public health experts are recommending we have our students wear masks,” Vitale said before placing the oxygen reader into the student’s face mask.
The device immediately began beeping and upon reading the data, Vitale showed the camera an oxygen level of 17.0, which is well below the OSHA standard.
Maintain peak vigilance by taking advantage of our latest sale now!
Student number two wore an N95 mask and, once again, the oxygen-reading device started to beep almost immediately and showed a peak oxygen drop of 18.1.
A third student, wearing a standard surgical mask, inserted the device and it beeped immediately with a 17.6 oxygen level reading.
For those who are interested in the equipment used, Vitale told viewers the device is a GX-2009 Portable Multi-Gas Detector by RKI instruments.
Another individual uploaded a similar video showing reduced oxygen levels when wearing a face mask, but the internet is censoring it.”
“Panic as 2 Chinese boys die while jogging with masks on. The boys died one week apart and one of the teens’ father told an Australian Outlet 7News that the teenager who died on April 24 at Dancheng Caiyuan Middle School in Henan province fell backwards while running wearing a mask.
2 14-year-old Chinese boys reportedly died early this month after running while wearing masks during physical education classes in China, New York Post reports.
He was wearing a mask while lapping the running track, then he suddenly fell backwards and hit his head on the ground. I suspect it was because he was wearing a mask, it couldn’t have been comfortable wearing a mask while running
Cao Lanxiu, professor at Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine has said wearing a mask was not likely to cause the boy’s death but he cannot be sure since an autopsy was not performed.”
https://mbaretimes.com/2020/05/23/panic-as-2-chin-on/
“ALL of them offer NO FILTERING whatsoever.
As you exhale you are ridding your lungs of contaminants and carbon dioxide. Cloth masks trap this carbon dioxide the best. It actually risks health. The moisture caught in these masks can become mildew ridden over night. Dry coughing, enhanced allergies, sore throat are all symptoms of a micro-mold in your mask.
Ultimate Answer: N95 blows the virus into the air from a contaminated person.
The surgical mask is not designed for the outside world and will not filter the virus upon inhaling through it. It’s filtration works on the exhale. (Like a vacuum bag it only works one way)
Cloth masks are WORSE than none.
The CDC wants us to keep wearing masks. The masks don’t work.
Wash your hands. Sanitize your hands. Don’t touch stuff. Wash your phone. Don’t touch people. And keep your distance. Why? . The masks do not work.
OSHA — the Occupational Safety & Health Administration — is cited as the top American organization for safety. They regulate and educate asbestos workers, surgical rooms, you name it.”https://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2020/06/19/masks-the-science-this-is-a-wow-video-follow-attorney-leigh-dundas/
“Beyond the lack of scientific data to support wearing a mask as a deterrent to a virus, Blaylock says the more pressing concern is what can and will happen to the wearer.
Now that we have established that there is no scientific evidence necessitating the wearing of a face mask for prevention, are there dangers to wearing a face mask, especially for long periods? Several studies have indeed found significant problems with wearing such a mask. This can vary from headaches, to increased airway resistance, carbon dioxide accumulation, to hypoxia, all the way to serious life-threatening complications.
There are studies to back that claim up.”
“ By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.”
Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks to Healthy Individuals
Time to revisit civics & read Texas law.
“ Napolitano said that “force of public opinion” could do “what the law cannot do” if the vast majority of people in an area shame those not wearing masks. (RELATED: ‘Sloppy Thinking’: Stanford’s Scott Atlas Rips Lockdown And Mask-Wearing Proponents For Denying Science And Ignoring Data)
“But in terms of police stopping you on the street or giving you a summons or a court imposing a fine, absolutely not,” he concluded. “First of all, these mayors and gubernatorial edicts are just suggestions. They are not the law.”
“ Turned over to the authorities by a fellow Catholic for refusing to wear a mask. A mask that is nothing but a sign of submission to a dictatorship erected overnight on the pretext of “limiting the spread” of a virus whose spread could never really be limited — and certainly not limited by a token piece of cloth over one’s face in a near-deserted cathedral.
Never, absolutely never, has the world seen a mass psychosis quite like this. There is indeed now no law but Corona. All rights are forfeited in defense of the Cult of the Mask. The Cult of the Mask betokens the terminal decline of the Catholic cult in the churches of an ecclesial establishment that is literally driving the people away in fear of a viral phantom whose appearance seems to make a fitting climax for the now more than half-century-long attempt by the “Church of Vatican II” to extinguish its own existence.”https://fatima.org/news-views/anatomy-of-a-mass-psychosis-as-the-virus-wanes-the-insanity-waxes/
“ All of these, and more, strategic outcomes are based on the manufactured weaponization of the COVID-19 virus to achieve a larger political objective. There is ZERO benefit to anyone other than Democrats for the overwhelming hype surrounding COVID-19.
It is not coincidental that all corporate media are all-in to facilitate the demanded fear that Democrats need in order to achieve their objectives. Thus there is an alignment of all big government institutions and multinationals to support the same.
Nothing is coincidental. Everything is political.”
Time to revisit civics & read Texas law.
“ Napolitano said that “force of public opinion” could do “what the law cannot do” if the vast majority of people in an area shame those not wearing masks. (RELATED: ‘Sloppy Thinking’: Stanford’s Scott Atlas Rips Lockdown And Mask-Wearing Proponents For Denying Science And Ignoring Data)
“But in terms of police stopping you on the street or giving you a summons or a court imposing a fine, absolutely not,” he concluded. “First of all, these mayors and gubernatorial edicts are just suggestions. They are not the law.”
“ Turned over to the authorities by a fellow Catholic for refusing to wear a mask. A mask that is nothing but a sign of submission to a dictatorship erected overnight on the pretext of “limiting the spread” of a virus whose spread could never really be limited — and certainly not limited by a token piece of cloth over one’s face in a near-deserted cathedral.
Never, absolutely never, has the world seen a mass psychosis quite like this. There is indeed now no law but Corona. All rights are forfeited in defense of the Cult of the Mask. The Cult of the Mask betokens the terminal decline of the Catholic cult in the churches of an ecclesial establishment that is literally driving the people away in fear of a viral phantom whose appearance seems to make a fitting climax for the now more than half-century-long attempt by the “Church of Vatican II” to extinguish its own existence.” https://fatima.org/news-views/anatomy-of-a-mass-psychosis-as-the-virus-wanes-the-insanity-waxes/
“ I wore surgical masks daily for 36 years as an anesthesiologist. Their purpose was to reduce the chance that I would infect an open wound with bacteria from my mouth. This article of faith has been shown to be false. If staff who are working outside of the immediate sterile field do not wear masks, there is no increase in wound infections. And this is in a closed environment where staff will be present for hours. This casts a very large cloud of doubt on the utility of masks for COVID-19.
Another problem arises when we look at the use of masks by the public. Even accepting the uncertain premise that masks are useful, “incorrect use and disposal may actually increase the risk of pathogen transmission, rather than reduce it, especially when masks are used by non-professionals such as the lay public.” Given that most “masks” are simply kept handy for use when required, set aside, and then re-used, most mask-wearing by the public is likely to increase virus exposure, not reduce it.”
Cui bono?
“ The outside world is the safest place you can be. The state of Florida has zero cases of COVID-19 that can be traced to outside transmission. During the day, solar UV kills all viruses very quickly, and there’s always enough air movement to disperse aerosols, making them non-infective. It has become clear that virtually all cases have been spread in closed spaces with prolonged (>10 minute) exposure. And as the studies I’ve cited show, other than N95s, masks are no help there. For that matter, six-foot spacing doesn’t help, either, since the aerosols that transmit the virus aren’t adequately dispersed.
Caregivers in a high-intensity environment should have all the fitted N95s they need. Beyond that, it’s time to recognize that the only person who should be wearing a mask is the Lone Ranger.”
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/06/what_good_do_the_masks_do_really.html
With so little benefit, it’s actually pretty crazy to wear a face mask. And it’s definitely crazy to elevate it to a moral standard as some people are doing. The puritanical American roots have turned on those who dare step outside with a full, unexposed face, just as they turned on the “witches” at Salem, in a period of mass hysteria that will be forever remembered as a dark point in the American experiment.
There’s great symbolism to saying you will or will not wear the face mask. Some go so far as to call them fear masks.
But there is also another practical factor involved: it may be a burden for you and you may be legitimately exempt from wearing it while society figures out if an executive should have the authority to make these sweeping orders. You are, after all, the only person whose actions you are able to control.
If a face mask presents a health burden to you, look at the written policy of your face mask order, identify health or other exemptions, and establish clear boundaries around your wearing of that face mask.
You will be better off for having defended your own boundaries and your own well-being. And though this additional benefit may not be in your own self-interest, you will have helped others who have a similar hesitation around masks defend their health and safety, by merely defending your own boundaries on this matter.
Not only can courage be contagious. It can be benevolent as well.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/05/allan-stevo/you-may-be-exempt-from-wearing-a-face-mask/
You must log in to post a comment.